User avatar
pancakes nonbinary_cat @pancakes@meow.company
2mo
i wish more people took the licensing issue of llm generated code more seriously
especially for copyleft licenses such as the GPL, AGPL, LGPL and EUPL
as far as i am concerned even though there may not be a legal precedent, llm generated code is toxic in terms of licensing as it is impossible to know the license of the training data
:MizukiHeart2@mk.absturztau.be:1
2
0
1
1
User avatar
pancakes nonbinary_cat @pancakes@meow.company
2mo
of course i am no expert on licensing or legal shit but this just seems like a fairly apparent thing that tends to get pushed to the side
:MizukiHeart2@mk.absturztau.be:1
1
0
1
1
User avatar
φ @fiore@brain.worm.pink
2mo
@pancakes idk personally i have nevwr cared much about licensing . like . its always been kinda obvious to me that licenses and copyrigjt are just a tool of corpos ? as is clearly seen now btw: as soon as theres prpfit in infringement, it becomes just Fine
0
0
0
0
User avatar
Alexia makko_bnuuy @alexia@starlightnet.work
2mo
@pancakes there's precedent in germany IIRC, though I'm eeby asf I won't look it up rn
0
0
1
0