User avatar
Hazel Cora @h@besties.house
1y
why cant we have gifs but with good compression while still supporting transparency and still looking good for pixel art
3
0
4
0
User avatar
Hazel Cora @h@besties.house
1y
apng exists and webp can do animations too i think but do either of them actually do good compression across frames?
2
0
2
0
User avatar
Hazel Cora @h@besties.house
1y
avif is also not performant in all browsers either. on my phone for instance it’s unbearably slow to play animated avif images
1
0
2
0
User avatar
pancakes nonbinary_cat @pancakes@meow.company
1y
@h i'd assumed jxl would be good but nothing actually supports it
1
0
1
0

User avatar
Hazel Cora @h@besties.house
1y
@pancakes i dont know if it does much compression for animations beyond what it does for individual images, i cant immediately find info on it doing compression across frames. in any case, if it is good for that use-case i dont think its hopeless that something will come of it, its still new and googles still building on it. i dont like the antagonising about it some ppl do (maybe im too optimistic haha)
2
0
1
0
User avatar
Hazel Cora @h@besties.house
1y
@pancakes like gif just has the transparency + frame stacking stuff for compressing animations. proper video formats do so much more than that, so i get the motivation for apps to just use mp4 these days, but that still doesnt have everything gif can do. i want an Actual, Proper replacement for everything gif can do, rather than just image sequences
0
0
1
0
User avatar
unnick verified_mlmvp @unnick@wolfdo.gg
1y
@h @pancakes iirc jxls animation compression is pretty similar to gif/apng/webp
1
0
1
0
User avatar
Hazel Cora @h@besties.house
1y
@unnick @pancakes yeah thats unfortunate. jxl’s compression of static images is ofc incredibly good though so its still something at least!
0
0
1
0